Category: Miscellaneous Thoughts

Super Human

I was as excited as anyone when I discovered that a new RoboCop movie was in the works. The 1987 original is one of my favourite films and I think a lot more could be done with today’s movie making technologies to improve on what was already a really great concept. It’s fantastic to see that there remains such an active group of fans and that Columbia Pictures and MGM are finally giving us all what we want.  There is certainly a great deal of buzz around this movie.

There is also renewed enthusiasm and discussion taking place regarding the ethics of combining man with machine, which is something I felt I needed to weigh in on. While Cybridity has not been named explicitly in any of these ethical discussions, “cybridity” is very much at the heart of RoboCop and human/machine interaction and I want to make a few things clear about our organization and how we conduct our business.

First of all, unlike what you see in movies, our company operates under a mandate of ethical standards and transparency. Detailed descriptions of every single one of our projects are listed on our corporate website.

Second, Cybridity follows a strict ethical guideline put in place and enforced by a third-party firm. We respect the rights of all living things and design our research and development scenarios accordingly. We have received awards and accolades from a number of engineering, medical and animal rights organizations, and are proud to tout an impeccable safety record.


Finally, while much of our products boast a seamless integration between human and machine, our technology is very much at the service of its human operator(s). Our products empower people who would otherwise not be able to walk, enjoy the beauty of a sunrise or embrace a loved one. They connect people with the world around them. They allow humans to live.

RoboCop and other movies like Minority ReportSurrogates and the recent Elysium (I’m still waiting for a modern Necromancer) have done much to grow the public’s interest in science and inspire young minds. And while these movies do much to provoke public dialogue and all-important self-reflection, they do not reflect the current view or spirit of what we are working towards at Cybridity.

At Cybridity, we strive to enhance the power and spirit of humanity through assistive technologies that do not replace,  but rather enhance, our everyday experiences of life, expression and love.

Dylan McConnell
CEO, Cybridity Industries


My sole Graduate English course for the Winter 2011 term (Jan-Apr 2011) is scheduled to be “Cyberbodies,” a course that “will explore how technology—from the computer mouse to genetic engineering—has impacted the human body, both materially and conceptually” (course description).

I have not put much thought into how the body should (or could) be studied academically outside of anatomy or kinesiology classes. To me, my body is my container, my “avatar,” that helps my internal being (my mind and whatever else might be in there—a soul, perhaps) move around and interact with the “outside” world. I use and abuse my body as I wish, and while I, like so many others, have a few issues with my body, I am more or less happy with what I’m stuck with.

I suppose that is how I see my body in a “material” sense, or a tangible, physical sense—but conceptually? I have no idea where to begin with the notion of perceiving the human body “conceptually.” In terms of what the body means to people outside of its use as a biological vehicle, the obvious idea that comes to mind is how people objectify one another in terms of their physical appearance. Today, this objectification seems to be simplified to a case of whether someone is “hot or not,” and females especially continue to be unfairly judged/valued in terms of their physical appearance.  Such objectification has been a part of human society forever, but things used to be more complicated. For women, the body was seen as a reproductive device, symbolized in art with magnified sexual organs (i.e. Venus of Willendorf) and kept from physical activity in order to preserve its condition. Fortunately, such notions are losing steam. But the female body continues to be portrayed in popular media (in North America) as an object of desire, especially on television shows like Keeping Up with the Kardashians, Desperate Housewives, and America’s Next Top Model. In the Middle East, women continue to wear hijabs in order to keep their bodies hidden, which preserves their modesty. I am not confident in my credibility as a feminist thinker (or an expert on Islamic religion for that matter), but female objectification is what I think of when I try to think of the human body “conceptually.”

Of course, an interesting twist to the Cyberbodies course is the addition of technology, specifically in the form of robotics and electronics, to the human body. Today we are surrounded by technology and “new media” of all forms, and nearly all of the communication we conduct with other people on a daily basis happens through electronic means, whether it be via the Internet, email, mobile phones, webcams, or a combination of all of the above. But do we simply use this technology, or have we become a part of the technology we’ve developed? I am familiar with the ideas of Marshal McLuhan, who considered technology to be an extension of the human body. But I am also familiar with movies like Terminator and The Matrix, which combine humans and technology seamlessly. I was a huge fan of the television show Reboot when I was younger, which showed how life may be like inside a computer—inside the “mainframe.” Needless to say, once Bob and his friends got lost in “the Web,” the show became a little too complicated for me, and I lost interest. I, like others in the mid-late 1990s, was still a little skeptical of this “Internet” idea, but now it seems as though I am now caught up in the mainframe and intimately tied to my computer and the Web, of which my computer (and everyone else’s) is a part.

That is how I understand the body and its relationship with technology in early January 2011. It will be interesting to see how my ideas of “cyberbodies” change over the course of this term—I do not doubt that they will.

– Dyldebeest